Welcome to Bendigo Weekly. Would you like to set this as your homepage?    

To make this website your home page:
1. Drag this icon and drop it onto the "House" icon on your browser
2. Select "Yes" from the pop up window.
To make this website your home page:
1. From the browser menu, click the Settings icon
2. Select Options
3. On the Basics tab, type this page's URL in the Home Page entry box and click Close
To make this website your home page:
1. From the browser menu, click tools
2. Select Preferences
3. On the General tab, type this page's URL in the Home Page entry box and click OK
To make this website your home page:
1. From the browser menu, click the Settings icon.
2. Select Preferences
3. On the General tab, type this page's URL in the Home Page entry box and you're done!
 

Traders aim for courts

mall1.jpg
GRAND DESIGN: But traders are not happy with the delays. PHOTO: Andrew Perryman
Posted by Admin
on 16/07/2009 at 04:10 PM
in BENDIGO NEWS -

By ANTHONY RADFORD

HARGREAVES Mall traders will make legal history if they are successful in winning compensation from the City of Greater Bendigo council.
About a month ago the Bendigo Weekly revealed a group of CBD traders was investigating a joint action against council for the delays surrounding the redevelopment of Hargreaves Mall.
Work on the mall began
in October, 2007 with a projected end date of November, 2008, on the eve of the council elections.
However, the project is not expected to be finished before October this year.
Last week the Weekly told the story of at least one mall trader who had suffered severe financial loss since the redevelopment began.
Well-known mall trader Martin Ruffell said there were more traders suffering.
“I know there are more. There are others in similar positions,” he said.
“We are down by as much as 50 per cent in recent months. Something has to give.”
About 20 traders attended an information session this week, with about six giving their apologies, to find out more about the possibility of legal action.
“The meeting was about talking to a solicitor and
finding out what course of action we can take,” he said.
“If this happens it will be a precedent in Australia.
“We all know where we sit and what we have in front of us.”
Mr Ruffell said the traders were concerned the council had not prepared for the impact the delays would have on
small businesses.
“At the end of the day our main dispute is the delay in construction,” he said.
“Council has admitted to us they had no compensatory element for the traders with the contractor.
“They haven’t considered the traders at all, only themselves.”
Mr Ruffell said that was at the heart of the proposed legal action.
“We believe they have failed in their duty of care to the traders by not including them in that compensation process,” he said.
“Council will be waiting until the project is done to look at compensation from the contractors, so we, too, may have to wait until it is finished to take the next step.”
Mr Ruffell said the group would meet again soon.
“We went away with a few things in the kitty and we will get together again soon and come up some sort of consensus what direction to take next,” he said.

4 Comments »

GIO or what ever you wish to call your self today, it is a pity that your favourite councillor did not ask more questions of the directors, as he has been in office long enough to know (well if he as not a fence sitter) that you have to ask these hard questions about develpoments. The new Police station had a lot of problems with footings so if the lights were on them our past his use by date councillor should have been on the ball, but no he wasn't he just did the usal nodding the head trick.

I am no engineer as you have stated but someone certainly stuffed it up in a big way didn't they.

As for the 'Borough things are really great out here as we have a councillors who has the guts to ask the hard questions, not llike a sheep. You shopuld come out this way and smell the roses there is no crap with our town.

"Fluff and bluff from Eaglehawk:

Didn't your wonderful Cr Fyffe vote for this upgrade? Maybe he did not study the plans enough or ask enough questions one would have to say"

Our revered and durable Cr Fyffe is not infallible? He is not invincible despite his durability, which is now well proven? This is a worry - maybe I am not gonna sleep well tonight - but then maybe I am! Cr Fyffe is not a structural engineer and I doubt you are either.

It seems to me that something went quite unpredictably wrong with the main structure, so that it moved, hence regrettably, could not endow the Mall with its full sculptural glory. Mmm, maybe you could put the monument-move down to a passionate act of God, after He looked down upon the gloomy colours of the new Mall, which while inner urban chic, do remind one of a morgue - I mean we are going to get there soon enough. Mmm, with all those hills and vales and great soil out at the Hawk, could 'Fluff and Buff' be a Fluff Bunny reference by any chance - sort of Watership Down, via Bendigo? Or maybe you just polish your fingernails a lot?

Be of good cheer, Fluff and Buff - the Mall Main Structure is not a Boeing 747 and you are not flying on it. Things could be worse. Chin up!

Didn't your wonderful Cr Fyffe vote for this upgrade?

Maybe he did not study the plans enough or ask enough questions one would have to say

How frightful, that it has come to this. What a schamozzle!

Its enough to make one superstitious about 5 million dollar Mall redevelopments - no one could have known that the big bucks 'main structure' could be fraught with problems. One has to feel for the designer.

Please login to post a comment.