Super suburbs on the plan

Bendigo Weekly | Bendigo Weekly | 17-Feb-2012

«
»
A RESPECTED engineer and former VicRoads boss has urged the City of Greater Bendigo council to create three super suburbs to ease the city’s residential land crisis.
Last week, local developer Don Erskine suggested historic Ravenswood Run, at more than 1000 hectares, was perfect for a greenfields suburb.
That came after council revealed it had to review its 2004 Residential Strategy because population and housing growth was greater than expected.
Trevor Phillips, who has worked with the Department of Transport  and on large Melbourne growth projects, has backed the Ravenswood plan, and called for it to be expanded.
He said Bendigo needed at least three large suburbs long term.
“The concept of a greenfields development has great merit,” he said.
“In my view there is urgent need to identify and plan at least three such brand-new communities on the perimeter of Bendigo  – one centered on Ravenswood, the second based around Lockwood and the third at Marong .
“Each new community would have the minimum potential of 16,000 residents with appropriate infrastructure providing residential, retail, commercial, employment, community and academic facilities to service the local demand.  
“Each of these three new suburbs is conceptually the size of Horsham or Echuca/Moama to convey the scale of what is being considered in  growing  Bendigo from 100,000 to 160,000 in total population.”
Mr Phillips said current planning priorities were short-sighted.
“What is apparent is the lack of vision and planning for such a contingency at both local and state level and the mire of planning regulations and conditions that once land is appropriately zoned  frustrate and negate the economic development of such land,” he said.
“A recent example of this is the Aspinell Street subdivision where trees became more important than homes.
“The concept of the City within the Forest has come back to bite everyone who wants to build with the imposition of punitive additional costs  to fire proof their house.
“The strategy should be changed to get the residential areas out of the  so-called forest so normal standards apply.”
Mr Phillips said the push to Epsom and Huntly would cause more problems than it solved.
 “The current policy of pushing the majority of the residential development to the Epsom/Huntly corridor is only adding to the existing concern of the volume of traffic along the only corridor through the CBD  to service that demand,” he said.
“In-fill development will be a long time coming unless there are either positive incentives, or disincentives  such as rate schemes to encourage owners to develop the land.”
 “It is time to think outside the square and to think of a Greater Bendigo, not living in a museum or forest and emphasising what you cannot do,” he said.
“The challenge of planning a future is to provide the answers to and to facilitate the task that has been set, not to put obstacles and hurdles in the way of those who have an equal or greater stake in that future.”
TLPB - selling now
Jake commented on 17-Feb-2012 03:57 PM5 out of 5 stars
Terrible idea. The answer to absorbing population growth shouldn't be to let Bendigo continue to sprawl. Infill development is an answer. Another is to promote transit-oriented development around the city's existing population nodes. Otherwise the cost
to ratepayers of expanding services to greenfield sites will be exorbitant, and the city will continue to depend on cars as the only viable means of transport.
Hayley commented on 20-Feb-2012 03:16 PM5 out of 5 stars
I agree with Jake - This is such a typical reponse by an engineer. Greenfields have been proven time and time again around the world to do nothing but fail the city and be an inefficient use of land and resources. Super suburbs around transit nodes is
the best idea. Kflat, Golden Square, CBD, E/Hawk, Epsom, Strath Village/University and Hospital. We don't want more sprawl in Bendigo!

Comment





Captcha Image